I started
writing books at 5 years old. I wrote
plays too, painted the scenery, composed the music and played the main parts.
I have always
loved doing everything and on top of working as an actress, I always wanted to
write novels professionally.
But I got
waylaid. I told someone about a
discovery I had made: women, hitherto thought to be absent from literature
before Jane Austen, were writing plays professionally 150 years earlier.
Then I said
‘someone should write a book about it.’ But
as I was the only person who knew about it, only I could write that book, The Female Wits. It was a publishing sensation. Then I was asked to write more non-fiction books
about 17th/18th century women. I was
constantly called to print, TV and radio to talk about them.
But I wanted
to write novels, not be consumed by a subject I had only got into by
fluke. So one day when Woman’s Hour
phoned I replied. “We got a
divorce.” I was moving
on.
Shakespeare
was allowed to do it, so were Charles Dickens, Graham Greene and countless
others. We may know Arthur Conan Doyle
only for Sherlock Holmes, but he also wrote sci-fi, poetry, historical fiction,
novels and plays.
However, in
modern publishing, changing genre is forbidden.
Even a slight shift provokes concern.
Ruth Rendell had to invent a new name simply to write a slightly
different type of crime novel – she wasn’t even moving out of her genre.
So my first
jump – from history into fiction - was a huge one, but, in order to satisfy
demands, I stayed within the period for which I was already well known, the
late Restoration, 1699.
I adore my
Countess series, and that world is to me, after all those years of work on the
period, as comfortable for me as my own living room. But so is the world I actually live in and when
new ideas bubble up I cannot resist grabbing them.
I had an idea to
write a contemporary novel using multiple narrators (some of them with quite
horrible personalities) passing the narrative along, as though in a relay
race. I also wanted to attempt to lead the
reader along, while repeatedly reversing their perceptions and sympathies.
While doing
all this, my overriding intention was, as usual, to keep people on the edge of
their seat, and make them laugh too.
The result is The
Murder Quadrille, a modern standalone murder thriller inspired by two things:
Patricia
Highsmith’s Woodrow Wilson’s Necktie. I was
in awe of how in a few pages she completely twists round the reader’s take on
events.
The work of Wilkie
Collins. I love his use of multiple
narrators. In The Woman In White I am
particularly fond of the hypochondriac uncle and love how, despite his being so
vile, you want more of him.
I finished writing
The Murder Quadrille and started the
practical matter of getting the book published.
It was not fun. I was firmly told
that only series books and, in my case, only historical crime series books would
be considered.
After all my
work, no one would even read it.
However, I
hate the word ‘No’, so I gave the novel to three world-famous crime-writers. They all told me they loved it. One of them, who never gives blurbs, told me
to self-publish. It was too good to keep
to myself, she said.
So here it is:
The
Murder Quadrille
The Murder Quadrille by Fidelis
Morgan is published in paperback on 25th October, £8.99.
More information can be found about Fidelis Morgan and her writing on her website.
No comments:
Post a Comment