Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts

Monday, 28 September 2020

My Atomic Love by Jennie Fields



Writing a novel is like mixing a cocktail. The elements must balance, the flavors need to be complex and interesting, yet marry well. And given a good stir, the final product must have a kick. The first element of the cocktail which makes up my new novel Atomic Love was inspired by the fact that my mother was a scientist. Or to be clear, she began as a scientist, a biochemist trained at the University of Chicago in the 1940’s and someone whose cancer research was so significant, her cancer paper was referenced well into the 1960’s. I didn’t discover the impact of her work until recently. She sometimes mentioned to us that she’d worked on an important cancer paper, but frankly, I thought her tale was apocryphal. 

You see, by the time I came along, my mother was no longer a pioneering researcher; she was a housewife. Like many American career women in the late 1940’s, when she married, she was expected to forfeit her job to a returning GI, give birth to 2.5 babies and in between host themed dinner parties which ended with towering gelatin desserts. She took her task as seriously as she had science. Even after three babies, her dinner parties were legendary, and she showed up at every Parent/Teacher meeting on time with pearls on. But her love for science and the powerful position she’d once held haunted her. She told me constantly, whatever you do, don’t give up your career. Don’t be like me

Another family story also found its way into the mix. My mother walked every day to the University of Chicago with her cousin Jean, who worked at the Metallurgical Laboratory. Jean would never tell my mother what she did there. She was so secretive, it put something of a rift between them. It wasn’t until years later that my mother discovered the Metallurgical Laboratory was home to the Manhattan Project. I believe Jean was a clerical worker for the Project, but even late in life, she’d been so sternly warned to keep her job a secret, she never whispered a single specific. That enforced silence made me want to know more. 

Research told me that there was, in fact, a female physicist, Leona Woods who was the
youngest member of the University of Chicago team and the only woman. Woods was a mentee of Nobelist Enrico Fermi and an important contributor to the first nuclear reaction. I took the liberty of putting my main character, Rosalind Porter in Woods’ position. Young, female. But unlike Woods, Rosalind abruptly loses her career. Deeply depressed by the destruction and loss of life caused by the bomb, then abruptly left by her colleague and lover, Thomas Weaver, Rosalind discovers someone’s written a report that says she’s unstable. With men coming home from the war, it didn’t take much to push a woman out of a job they didn’t believe should have been hers in the first place. She feels certain it’s Weaver who’s betrayed her.

The book begins four years later when a contrite Weaver contacts Rosalind saying he must explain what happened between them. Shortly afterwards, she’s approached by FBI agent Charlie Szydlo, a wounded vet suffering with PTSD from his years as a Japanese prisoner of war. He asks Rosalind to let Weaver back into her life and spy on him, because the FBI believe Weaver’s selling atomic secrets to the Russians. 

Stirred right into this mix is the paradoxical culture of the early 1950’s. The war is over. People desperately want to be happy, to wear a smile again. But almost everyone is damaged by their war experiences. Many of the returning G.Is, like Charlie suffer from disabling PTSD. A large number of women, like Rosalind, have lost the jobs they loved, and have been relegated to being helpmates. The common trope of the day is the happy four person household with the wife in an apron and heels handing a stiff drink to the husband who’s loosening his tie after a long day. The children are playing quietly in the corner. Everyone is smiling, but in truth, almost no one is happy. 

So here’s the cocktail of Atomic Love: a disgraced female scientist, a possible spy, an FBI agent looking for answers. All stirred into the backdrop of a scarred postwar America. To find out more, you’ll have to take a sip.

Atomic Love by Jennie Fields is published by Penguin Books on 17 September 2020 £12.99
Chicago, 1950. Rosalind Porter has always defied expectations - in her work as a physicist on the Manhattan Project to design the atomic bomb, and in her passionate love affair with coworker Thomas Weaver. Five years after the end of both, her guilt over the results of her work and her heartbreak over Weaver are intertwined. She has almost succeeded in resigning herself to a more conventional life . . . Then Weaver gets back in touch. But so does the FBI. Agent Charlie Szydlo wants Rosalind to spy on Weaver, whom the FBI suspects of selling nuclear secrets to Russia. As Rosalind's final assignment launches her on a dangerous mission to find the truth, she faces a heartbreaking choice . . . Believe the man who taught her how to love? Or trust the man who her love might save?

Wednesday, 4 March 2020

Excerpt from Rules for Perfect Murders by Peter Swanson

I am pleased to host an extract from Peter Swanson’s new book Rules For Perfect Murders as part of the #Rules For Perfect Murders blog tour.

Excerpt from Rules For Perfect Murdersby Peter Swanson Copyright March  2020

The front door opened, and I heard the stamp of the FBI agent’s feet on the doormat. It had just begun to snow, and the air that rushed into the store was heavy and brimming with energy. The door shut behind the agent. She must have been just outside when she’d called because it had only been about five minutes since I’d agreed to meet with her. 

Except for me, the store was empty. I don’t know exactly why I’d opened it that day. A storm was forecast to drop over two feet of snow, beginning in the morning and continuing through until the following afternoon. Boston Public Schools had already announced they were closing early, and they’d canceled all classes for the following day. I’d called the two employees who were scheduled to come in—Emily for the morning shift and early afternoon, and Brandon for the afternoon and evening—and told them both to stay home. I logged on to the Old Devils Book- store Twitter account and was about to send out a tweet saying that we were closed for the duration of the storm, but something stopped me. Maybe it was the thought of spending all day in my apartment alone. And besides, I lived less than half a mile from the store. 
I decided to go in; at the very least I’d be able to spend some time with Nero, straighten up some shelves, maybe even pack up some online orders. 
A sky the color of granite was threatening snow as I unlocked the front doors on Bury Street in Beacon Hill. Old Devils Book- store is not in a high-traffic area, but we’re a specialty bookstore— mystery books, used and new—and most of our customers seek us out or simply order directly from our website. On a typical Thursday in February I wouldn’t be surprised if the total number of customers barely reached double digits, unless of course we had an event planned. Still, there was always work to do. And there was Nero, the store cat, who hated spending the day alone. Also, I couldn’t remember if I’d fed him extra food the night before. It turned out I probably hadn’t because when I stepped through the front door, he came racing along the hardwood floor to greet me. He was a ginger cat of indeterminate age, perfect for the store because of his willingness (his eagerness, really) to put up with the affections of strangers. I turned on the store lights, fed Nero, then brewed myself a pot of coffee. At eleven, Margaret Lumm, a regular, entered. 
“What are you doing open?” she asked.
“What are you doing out?”
She held up two grocery bags from an upscale grocery store on 
Charles Street. “Provisions,” she said, in her patrician voice.
We talked about the latest Louise Penny novel. She talked, mostly. I pretended I’d read it. These days I pretend I’ve read many books. I do read the reviews from the major trade publications, of course, and I go to a few blogs. One of them is called The Armchair Spoiler and it includes reviews of recent titles that discuss endings. I no longer have the stomach for contemporary mystery novels—sometimes I reread a particular favorite from my childhood—and I find the book blogs indispensable. I suppose I could be honest, tell people that I’ve lost interest in mystery novels, that I primarily read history these days, poetry before I go to bed, but I prefer to lie. The few people I’ve told the truth to always want to know why I’ve given up reading crime, and it’s not something I can talk about. 
I sent Margaret Lumm away with a used copy of Ruth Rendell’s Shake Hands Forever that she was 90 percent sure she’d never read. Then I ate the lunch I’d packed a chicken salad sandwich and was just about thinking of calling it a day when the phone rang. 
“Old Devils Bookstore,” I answered.
“Is Malcolm Kershaw available?” A woman’s voice. “Speaking,” I said.
“Oh, good. This is Special Agent Gwen Mulvey of the FBI. I’d love a little bit of your time to ask you a few questions.”
“Okay,” I said.
“Is now good?”
“Sure,” I said, thinking she wanted to talk on the phone, but instead she told me she’d be right over and disconnected the line. I stood for a moment, phone in hand, imagining what an FBI agent named Gwen would look like. Her voice on the phone had been raspy, so I imagined her to be nearing retirement, an imposing, humorless woman in a tan raincoat. 
A few minutes later Agent Mulvey pushed through the door, looking very different from how I’d imagined her. She was in her thirties, if that, and wearing jeans that were tucked into forest green boots, plus a puffy winter jacket and a white knit hat with a pom-pom on it. She stomped her boots on the welcome mat, removed her hat, and came across to the checkout counter. I came around to meet her, and she reached out a hand. She had a firm handshake, but her hand was clammy. 
“Agent Mulvey?” I asked. 
“Yes, hi.” Snowflakes were melting on her green coat, leaving behind dark spots. She briefly shook her head the ends of her thin, blond hair were wet. “I’m surprised you’re still open,” she said. 
“I’m just about to close up, actually.” 
“Oh,” she said. She had a leather bag slung over one shoulder and she lifted the strap over her head, then unzipped her jacket. “You have some time, though?” 
“I do. And I’m curious. Should we talk back in my office?” 
She turned back and glanced at the front door. The tendons in her neck popped out against her white skin. “Will you be able to hear if a customer comes in?” she said. 
“I don’t think that’ll happen, but, yes, I’ll be able to hear. It’s this way.” 
My office was more of a nook at the back of the store. I got Agent Mulvey a chair and went around the desk and sat in my leather recliner, its stuffing bulging out from the seams. I positioned myself so that I could see her between two stacks of books. “I’m sorry,” I said. “I forgot to ask you if you wanted anything? There’s still some coffee in the pot.” 
“No, I’m fine,” she said, removing her jacket and putting her leather bag, more of a briefcase, really, on the floor by her side. She wore a black crewneck sweater under the coat. Now that I could really see her, I realized it wasn’t just her skin that was pale. It was all of her: the color of her hair; her lips; her eyelids, almost translucent; even her glasses with their thin wire rims almost disappeared into her face. It was hard to know exactly what she looked like, almost like some artist had rubbed a thumb across her features to blur them. “Before we start, I’d like to ask you to please not discuss anything we are about to talk about with anyone. Some of it is public record but some of it is not.” 
“Now I’m really curious,” I said, aware that my heart rate had accelerated. “And, yes, absolutely, I won’t tell anyone.” 
 “Great, thank you,” she said, and she seemed to settle in her chair, her shoulders dropping, her head squaring with mine. 
“Have you heard about Robin Callahan?” she asked. 
Robin Callahan was a local news anchor who, a year and a half ago, had been found shot in her home in Concord, about twenty- five miles northwest of Boston. It had been the leading local news story since it had happened, and despite a suspicious ex-husband, no arrests had been made. “About the murder?” I said. “Of course.” 
“And what about Jay Bradshaw?”
I thought for a moment, then shook my head. “I don’t think so.” “He lived in Dennis on the Cape. In August he was found beaten to death in his garage.” “No,” I said. 
“You sure?”
“I’m sure.”
“Then what about Ethan Byrd?”
“That name rings a bell.”
“He was a college student from UMass Lowell who went missing over a year ago.”
“Okay, right.” I did remember this case, although I couldn’t remember any of the details.
“He was found buried in a state park in Ashland, where he was from, about three weeks after he’d gone missing.”
“Yeah, of course. It was big news. Are those three murders connected?”
She leaned forward on her wooden chair, reached a hand down to her bag, then brought it back suddenly, as though she’d changed her mind about something. “We didn’t think so, at first, except that they’re all unsolved. But someone noticed their names.” She paused, as though giving me a chance to interrupt her. Then she said, “Robin Callahan. Jay Bradshaw. Ethan Byrd.” 
I thought for a moment. “I feel like I’m failing a test,” I said. “You can take your time,” she said. “Or I can just tell you.” “Are their names related to birds?” I said.
She nodded. “Right. A Robin, a Jay, and then the last name of Byrd. It’s kind of a stretch, I realize, but . . . without going into too much detail, after each murder the local police station closest to the crime received . . . what appeared to be a message from the killer.” 
“So they are connected?” 
“It seems that way, yes. But they might be connected in an- other way, as well. Do the murders remind you of anything? I’m asking you because you are someone who is an expert on detective fiction.” 
I looked at the ceiling of my office for a moment, then said, “I mean, it sounds like something fictional, like something from a serial killer novel, or something from an Agatha Christie.” 
She sat up a little straighter. “Any particular Agatha Christie novel?” 
“The one that’s jumping to my mind is A Pocket Full of Rye for some reason. Did that have birds?” 
“I don’t know. But that’s not the one I was thinking of.”
“I guess it’s similar to The A.B.C. Murders as well,” I said. Agent Mulvey smiled, like she’d just won a prize. “Right. That’s the one I’m thinking of.”
“Because nothing connects the victims except for their names.” “Exactly. And not just that, but the deliveries to the police station. 
In the book Poirot gets letters from the killer signed A. B. C.” “You’ve read it, then?”
“When I was fourteen, definitely. I read almost all of Agatha Christie’s books, so I probably read that one, too.”
“It’s one of her best,” I said, after a brief pause. I’d never forgotten that particular Christie plot line. There are a series of murders and what connects them are the victims’ names. First, someone with the initials A. A. is killed in a town that begins with the letter A, then someone with the initials B. B. is killed in a B town. You get the idea. It turns out that the perpetrator really only wanted to kill one of the victims, but he made it look like a series of crimes done by a deranged serial killer. 
“You think so?” the agent said.
“I do. One of her best plots, for sure.”
“I’m planning on reading it again, but I did just Wikipedia it to remind myself of the story. There was a fourth murder in the book, as well.” 
“I think so, yes,” I said. “Someone with a D name was the last person killed. And it turned out that the killer was making it look like a madman was doing it when all along he just wanted to kill one person. So the other murders are basically cover.” 
“That’s what the plot summary on Wikipedia said. In the book it was the person with the double C name who was the intended victim all along.” 
“Okay,” I said. I was starting to wonder why she had come to me. Was it just because I owned a mystery bookstore? Did she need a copy of the book? But if that were the case, then why did she ask for me, specifically, on the phone? If she just wanted someone who worked in a mystery bookstore, then she could have come inside and talked with anyone. 
“Can you tell me anything else about the book?” she asked, then added, after a moment, “You’re the expert.” 
“Am I?” I said. “Not really, but what is it you want to know?” “I don’t know. Anything. I was hoping you’d tell me.”
“Well, besides the fact that a strange man comes into the store everyday and buys a new copy of The A.B.C. Murders, I don’t know what else to tell you.” Her eyes raised for a moment before she realized I’d made a joke, or an attempt at one, then she smiled a little in acknowledgment. I asked her, “You think these murders are related to the book?” 
do,” she said. “It’s too fantastical for it not to be.” 
“Is it that you think someone’s copying the books in order to get away with a murder? That someone wanted to murder Robin Callahan, for example, but then murdered the other people to make it look like a serial killer obsessed with birds?” 
“Maybe,” Agent Mulvey said, and she rubbed a finger along the edge of her nose, up near her left eye. Even her small hands were pale, the fingernails unpainted. She was quiet again. It was a strange interview, full of pauses. She was hoping I’d fill in the silence, I guess. I decided to not say anything. 
Eventually, she said, “You must be wondering why I came to talk with you.” 
“I am,” I said. 
“Before I tell you I’d like to ask you about one other recent case.” 
“Okay.” 
“You probably haven’t heard of it. A man named Bill Manso. He was found near the train tracks in Norwalk, Connecticut, back in the spring. He was a regular commuter on a particular train, and initially it looked as though he’d jumped, but now it looks as though he was killed elsewhere and brought to the tracks.” 
“No,” I said, shaking my head. “I didn’t hear about it.” “Does it remind you of anything?”
“Does what remind me of anything?”
“The nature of his death.” 
“No,” I said, but that wasn’t entirely true. It did remind me of something, but I couldn’t remember exactly what it was. “I don’t think so,” I added. 
She waited again, and I said, “Do you want to tell me why you’re questioning me?” 
She unzipped her leather bag and removed a single sheet of paper. “Do you remember a list you wrote for this store’s blog, back in 2004? A list called ‘Eight Perfect Murders’?” 
Rules for Perfect Murders by Peter Swanson published by Faber & Faber
If you want to get away with murder, play by the rules A series of unsolved murders with one thing in common: each of the deaths bears an eerie resemblance to the crimes depicted in classic mystery novels. The deaths lead FBI Agent Gwen Mulvey to mystery bookshop Old Devils. Owner Malcolm Kershaw had once posted online an article titled 'My Eight Favourite Murders,' and there seems to be a deadly link between the deaths and his list - which includes Agatha Christie's The ABC Murders, Patricia Highsmith's Strangers on a Train and Donna Tartt's The Secret History. Can the killer be stopped before all eight of these perfect murders have been re-enacted?

Wednesday, 10 January 2018

A Look in the Mirror by Karen Ellis

What is it about the criminal mind that people find so fascinating?  We read books about characters whose behaviour crosses limits, we watch film and television about crime and punishment, we soak up news about the latest terrible thing to happen to an innocent bystander…who could have been ourselves.  And some of us also spend a good portion of our time researching and writing stories about characters who suffer at the hands of criminals and the police who devote themselves to stopping the madness.

For me, as a novelist working in the crime genre, the fascination lies not in the violence itself but the internal workings of a human mind that produces the actions that lead to it.  In this glorious, gruesome soup of humanity that is life on earth, this communal journey at once prosaic and profound, why do a few people stray so far from what most of us consider acceptable behavior and do things that terrify the rest of us?  Nature or nurture?  A brain tumor?  Childhood abuse?  Bad genes?  Why?  Especially when so many of the rest of us, including the cops, manage to overcome our own life challenges and live essentially decent lives.

This is something I explore in A Map of the Dark, my novel about a troubled FBI investigator who battles her own demons while hunting down a notorious serial murderer.  Special Agent Elsa Myers does good, repeatedly, but deep down she isn’t all good and it haunts her.

Therein lies what I believe is the real power of suspense; it’s always psychological, rooted in a complexity of the human condition that pits every single one of us against our worst instincts.  Most of us overcome negative impulses, learn to put them in their places and live lives that emphasize and develop our better selves.  Others don’t, or can’t.  Why did Mother Teresa, for example, swing to one extreme on the spectrum of human potential?  Why did, say, Jeffrey Dahmer swing to the other far extreme?  Why do some people care so deeply that they spend their lives fighting crime?  Why are others content to turn a blind eye and pretend it has nothing to do with them when in fact is has everything to do with them?  The scale of good and evil involves, and expresses, each and every one of us.  And that, I believe, is why we’re so fascinated by it:  because, true narcissists that we humans are, we yearn to understand ourselves.  Crime stories are a form of mirror gazing in bright light, a chance to examine and possibly understand ourselves for what we really are, have been, or might be.

This is also why I love reading novels as much as writing them.  Regardless of how a book is categorized by genre and sub-genre, if there’s a full-minded conflicted character at the heart of it, I want to be there.  Though (for me) it only works its real magic if the author can truly write, wielding the fine tools of language to bring shape and nuance to the plight of a tortured mind.  This is the durable power of crime writing greats like Patricia Highsmith.  It’s why author John Fowles’ first novel, The Collector, still rings chillingly true.  Why Truman Copote’s In Cold Blood was so influential that it defined a new genre of “creative nonfiction.”  And it’s why Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov’s gorgeously written tale of a predatory pedophile, is powerful both as thriller and literary tour de force.  Each of these authors wrote what today we call “thrillers” at one point or another, regardless of whether their legacies are now fixed in the canon as “crime writers” or “authors of literature.”


By melding a storyteller’s artistry with an all too human fascination with why we are the way we are, we are brought deeply inside a universal hunger to understand the problem of good vs. evil.  In this strange space, we are invited to explore the most human of conflicts.  We identify with these characters and their stories because in them we see the terrifying image of ourselves in all our contradictory potential.  And it scares us.

A Map of the Dark by Karen Ellis (Published by Hodder and Stoughton)
 FBI Agent Elsa Myers finds missing people. She knows how it feels to be lost. Though her father lies dying in a hospital north of New York City, Elsa cannot refuse a call for help. A teenage girl has gone missing from Forest Hills, Queens, and during the critical first hours of the case, a series of false leads hides the fact that she did not go willingly. With each passing hour, as the hunt for Ruby deepens into a search for a man who may have been killing for years, the case starts to get underneath Elsa's skin. Everything she has buried - her fraught relationship with her sister and niece, her self-destructive past, her mother's death - threatens to resurface, with devastating consequences.

More information about the author can be found on her website. You can also follow her on Twitter @katialief

Read the Shots review here.

Sunday, 15 March 2015

Jorn Lier Horst on tracking down the serial killer

Jorn Lier Horst is one of Norway’s most experienced police investigators, but also one of Scandinavia’s most successful crime writers. His enthralling, intelligent crime novels give an unusually detailed and realistic insight into how serious crimes are investigated as well as the workings of both the police and the press.

Among a host of literary prizes, the Norwegian Booksellers’ Prize, the Riverton Prize (Golden Revolver), the Glass Key for best crime novel in the Nordic countries, and the prestigious Martin Beck Award, have all been conferred on Jorn Lier Horst for his literary output.


* * *

TRACKING DOWN THE SERIAL KILLER

One person has rampaged through the crime literature of the past thirty years, more than anyone else. The serial killer. However, his – and statistics show that the serial killer is much more likely to be male - traces go much further back than you might think.

As for me, I belong to the group that prefers to give these psychopaths a wide berth, both as a reader and a writer, and I produced ten previous novels before deciding to set William Wisting on the pursuit of a serial killer. The groundwork for The Caveman became a fascinating journey into some of the sickest human psyches the world has ever known.

The actual concept of serial killing was first used in American police reports in the 1960s. At the beginning of the 1970s, the FBI introduced the term in cases where one perpetrator was responsible for more than two murders committed in various locations at different times.

The rest of this fascinating and thought provoking article can be found on the Shots website. A review of The Caveman can be found here as well.

You can also find more information about the author on his website. You can follow him on Twitter @LierHorst and on Facebook.