D A Mishani
is an Israeli crime writer, editor and literary scholar specializing in the
history of detective fiction. His first detective novel, "The Missing File", was published in
Hebrew in 2011. Translation rights for
the novel, the first in a crime series featuring police inspector Avraham
Avraham, were sold to more than 10 territories.
D. A. Mishani lives with his wife and two children in Tel Aviv, and is
currently writing the second novel in the series, "Possibility of violence". The Missing
File is set in his home town of Holon, Israel.
After the
publication of my novel, The Missing File,
the first in a detective series featuring Israeli police inspector Avraham
Avraham, I was asked by journalists from all over the world what detectives I enjoyed
reading and why I am so suspicious of detective figures. This question was posed mainly because my
protagonist, Inspector Avraham, spends his spare time reading detective novels
and proving all literary detectives are wrong.
When I answered, I liked many detectives, but exactly like my character
was always suspicious of the solutions they offered, I was often asked: ‘Are
you sure? And do you suspect even
Sherlock Holmes?’
So I feel
that the publication of The Missing File
in Holmes's homeland (and in a publishing house situated on Baker street!) is
the right time for me to confess this: I very much enjoy reading Sherlock Holmes's
stories, and in fact I read them over and over again, but I don't believe a
word Holmes is saying. I suspect his
motives, I suspect his solutions, and I even think he is more involved in the
crimes he is investigating than he is letting us know.
Consider
his vacations, for example. Wherever he goes,
a murder is committed! He lets us
believe that he is in this crime-solving business because nobody else can do it
but him and because without him society is forever blindfolded and lost. But is this really the case with Holmes?
Most
readers are misled to think that the narrative structure of a classic detective
story goes like this: in a peaceful environment, a murder takes place; then the
detective appears to solve the mystery and serenity is once again restored. Well, Inspector Avraham and I discovered that
with Holmes (and some other suspicious detectives); it does not work like that
at all.
Read again The Adventure of the Devil's Foot, for
example, and I grant you that you will be surprised. The Cornwall village in which the story takes
place is indeed very peaceful but only until Holmes and Watson arrive there for
vacation. And the murder occurs only
after they arrive! Is it a mere
coincidence? How can it be if this is also
exactly the case in The Reigate Puzzle? Again, the Surrey village is serene, not
until a murder takes place but until the detective arrives there for his vacation
– and it is only afterwards that the hideous crime occurs.
And there
is another thing we have recently noticed, me and Avraham. In both cases, and many more, Holmes is going
for vacation because he needs some rest from his investigations. Watson believes him to be on the verge of
physical and mental breakdown and this is why he takes him to a peaceful
village where no crimes will ever occur.
But then, of course, a murder is committed and Holmes is back to work
again. He does not have any rest but in
the conclusion of both stories, he has miraculously recovered. ‘I think our quiet rest in the country has
been a distinct success’, he tells Watson in the last lines of The Reigate Puzzle, ‘and I shall
certainly return much invigorated to Baker Street tomorrow’.
So is
Holmes really weakened by his investigations or is he invigorated by them? And how is it that wherever he goes, even the
most peaceful places in England, murder follows?
I will let
you draw your own conclusions (I have mine) but nevertheless refer you to a
passage from A Study in Scarlet. ‘There are no crimes and no criminals in
these days,’ complains Holmes to Watson, not long after they meet. ‘What is the use of having brains in our profession? I know well that I have it in me to make my
name famous.’
Might this
be a clue to Holmes's true involvement in the crimes he is solving?
Might this
imply that he is inciting the mysteries in order to spread his reputation? Or is it just me and my Inspector Avraham who
are too suspicious, having read the stories too many times?
1 comment:
I am tempted to read all of Sherlock Holmes again to try to work out just how much the Detective might be involved rather more circumspectly . . . Intriguing!!
Post a Comment