Wednesday, 14 September 2011

Bouchercon here we come!!


This is the first of what will hopefully be my blog about Bouchercon. How frequent it is going to be I do not know.

Bouchercon does not exactly start until tomorrow but pre-Bouchercon stuff has been fun already. Thanks to Jon Jordan so far I have managed to go to a baseball game and saw the St Louis Cardinals beat the Atlanta Braves along with the ever delightful Ruth Jordan (Mrs Crimespree), Kirstie Long and Paul Jordan. At the same time the St Louis Rams were playing the Philadelphia Eagles and I have to say that despite the fact that I was at the baseball game I was also keeping my eye on the football results. Why you may ask? That is because I support Philadelphia Eagles so it was nice to see the results and realised that they beat the Rams! I have had a trip round the City Garden and have seen the wonderful sculptures and the pink flamingos! If you have chance to go to the City Garden then one should do so as it is a delight.















Since mid-morning Monday people have already started to turn up. I finally got to meet the wonderfully delightful Jen Forbus. Hi Jen! Adrian Magson and his wife Ann were amongst the first Brits to arrive (aside from myself and Kirstie long) who have been in St Louis since Saturday. Also renewed my acquaintance with Ann McNulty whom I last saw at Baltimore and also B G Ritts. Also met Kat Tromp again, John Purcell and Emily Bronstein (whom I last saw at Crimefest last year!). It was also lovely to see again after such a long time McKenna Jordan who owns Murder by the Book in Houston and Crimespree’s comic and film extraordinaire Jeremy Lynch along with his lovely wife Jill and his mother. Of course the place to be is the bar!

Pictures © Ayo Onatade

Yesterday evening (Tuesday) a lot more Brits started to arrive. My fellow Shotsmag colleagues Mike Stotter and Ali Karim flew in with Roger Ellory, Lauren Henderson, CWA Chairman Peter James, and Guest of Honour Val McDermid and rather later on Tuesday night (sans luggage) Russel McLean. Even though things have not really started today (Wednesday) is going to be rather busy. Trucks to unload with all the book bags and the stuff for registration, which should start @3pm this afternoon. The book bags are stuffed full of wonderful books and I dare anyone to complain! There will also be a swap table set up so if people want to leave books and or swap them there. It will be interesting to see how the hotel manage to cope with the large influx of people that are no doubt due to turn up today. I am sure that they will be fine as they have been excellent so far. So, if you see me wandering around the hotel at some stage during Bouchercon please do come up and say hello, give me a hug as I am sure that I may not remember to do so or I might be distracted and I would not want anyone to think that I was ignoring them on purpose.

There are also a lot of pre-Bouchercon activities taking place as well today. Noir at the Bar will be starting at eight PM, will be held at Meshuggah Café 6269 Delmar Boulevard Saint Louis, MO 63130 (314) 726-56626269. Admission is free, but bring money for drinks and books. Food is also available. Subterranean Books and Bouchercon present Charlaine Harris and Laurell K. Hamilton in an intimate Q&A to benefit the St. Louis Public Library, at Christ Church Cathedral, 1210 Locust Street (across from Central Library, two blocks from convention hotel), Wednesday, Sept 14 6pm (Doors at 5pm). This is a ticketed event and your ticket price gains you admittance to the one-hour event and gets you a signed copy of Harris' SOOKIE STACKHOUSE COMPANION or Hamilton's HIT LIST.

Tickets available here

St Louis County Library presents “Suspense Night 2011” on Wednesday, September 14, at 7 p.m. at Library Headquarters, 1640 S. Lindbergh Blvd. The free event brings together seven suspense authors from across the country. The authors are Megan Abbott, Reed Farrell Coleman, S J Rozan, Peter Spiegleman, Steve Hamilton, Lisa Lutz and Christa Faust.

Tuesday, 13 September 2011

Phil Rickman - Merrily Watkins deals with the Secrets of Pain!


Today’s guest blogger is Phil Rickman who is the author of the Merrily Watkins series. The Secrets of Pain is the 10th book in the Merrily Watkins Series. He has won awards for his television and radio journalism. Music is often a theme in his novels as well and they range from the fictional to the real. He also presents the Radio Wales book programme “Phil the Shelf”.

Ten books. Wow. Surprising how quickly that happened. A whole series. And ten books does seem like a complete series. Certainly the point at which some crime writers I could name (but obviously won’t) began to run out of ideas.

So, obviously I had a decision to make. Was it Reichenbach Falls time for Merrily Watkins?

I mean, I never really wanted to write about a vicar. I knew from the start what would happen, and it did. Readers of grittily realistic crime fiction turned away with a knowing sneer. Clerical mysteries... yeah... right. While readers of so-called clerical mysteries often reacted like the Amazon reviewer who wrote:

I bought this book in error. I was looking for a murder mystery. Unfortunately this is not the type of book I like to read. The book is set in a village where there is an undercurrent of darkness throughout. The theme is evil/superstition/darkness and is not about solving a murder. Most of the characters seem to be disturbed. The church element only seems to be there to add some sexual fantasy. I was not comfortable with the book and the more I read the more I felt it would be wrong to carry on reading. Having turned to the end I realised that I most definitely was making the right decision to stop reading and I deleted the book from my Kindle and pc.

You can read it in full on Amazon under The Wine of Angels. While a touch blinkered, it’s undoubtedly the best one-star review I’ve ever had and must have attracted quite a lot of those readers who normally would turn away with a knowing sneer. But you get the idea: this series was unlikely to be an overnight success. It was rarely what anyone expected... least of all me.

Clerical mysteries undoubtedly have their place in the annals of crime fiction but they are, to an extent, fantasy. Very few vicars nail killers… well not more than once, anyway.

And fantasy was the last place I wanted to go. True, I’d started as a writer of supernatural thrillers but, after a few years, I was backing off in horror at the direction the genre was taking: whole armies of vampires - fairy stories, essentially. I needed some reality, a discipline. So it had to be crime. I always loved crime novels, especially procedurals.

Yet I didn’t want to leave the paranormal behind. I’m interested in anomalies, always have been, and find Richard Dawkins dispiriting in every conceivable sense of the word. But ghost-hunters, real and fictional, can be irritating too.

And if I was looking for a credible professional.... well, there was only one kind, and it opened a big can of worms.

Exorcists had rarely been dealt with, in an authentic way, since William Blatty’s masterpiece in the 1970s. And that was about Catholics priests. I needed a woman.

I knew that every Church of England diocese had at least one exorcist. But what did they actually do - here in Britain, in the third millennium? And how would it be possible to write about one without coming over as some kind of disturbed religious zealot?

Talking to working exorcists, you discover that, in these cautious, secular times, they’re often appointed for their scepticism. You learn how few of them have ever encountered a convincing case of demonic possession. How the dividing line between the psychic and the psychological is continually being stretched and blurred. I even found one who didn’t believe in ghosts. And the C of E doesn’t called them exorcists any more, they’re deliverance ministers or consultants. Personally, I prefer exorcist, but you have to go with what you’re given.

What’s interesting is that it isn’t unusual for their paths to intersect with criminal investigations. It was only because of a particularly horrifying domestic murder that the Church of England decided to replace the term exorcism with the less-sinister deliverance. And the politics were fascinating, it seemed the darker recesses of the Church of England had more in common with Le Carre´s Circus than it might care to admit. It soon became clear that I was into something extraordinary which could be the basis for an entirely new approach to crime fiction.

The theme is not about solving a murder. Mrs Amazon one-star certainly got that bit right. I never wanted a super-sleuth.

Merrily Watkins, Deliverance Consultant for the Diocese of Hereford, is the single mother of a teenager who’s more into paganism. Merrily smokes. She isn’t feisty, makes mistakes, and lives with insecurity. In the early days I used to get scary emails like the one that said, ‘I’m very disappointed. I wanted her to be God’s Warrior in the Battle Against Evil!’

In your dreams. And, OK, very occasionally, hers. And then she wakes up and it just isn’t that simple. For a few dismal years, Merrily Watkins inhabited the no-readers-land between the horror shelf and cosy crime. I got very tired of the term ‘clerical sleuth’ being applied to a woman who rarely solved anything and was constantly deconstructing her belief-system. And I didn’t do cosy.

So, at first, not many people got it. Then, gradually, as readers began to adjust to the idea of a decent woman trying to handle a medieval job in a scornful world, the series accumulated what I think is called ‘a substantial cult following’ - i.e. you don’t get rich but you do acquire serious fans.

At first, I expected the clergy to hate Merrily. But then, there were some things about the clergy that I didn’t understand. ‘Thank God,’ one said. ‘We might finally be saying goodbye to the Derek Nimmo Factor.’ I also had an early email from a diocesan exorcist who said, the low-key approach is exactly right.

The Deliverance ministry operates in a netherworld of weirdo’s, misfits, the paranoid and the disturbed. Most times the disturbances have a rational explanation. Sometimes they don’t. Sometimes you see a crack of strange light under a slightly open door. Momentarily, and then it’s gone.

But it continues to lure me back. Ten books is only a complete series when the characters and the locations have stopped talking to you.

Anyway, I took a year off to write something different - an historical thriller - just to prove I could. Without the baggage of a backlist, it sold surprisingly well, and even signalled a new direction. But I couldn’t lose the suspicion that the Merrily novels were more important. Also, they allowed me to have more fun with dialogue and to explore my obsession with folklore and a sense of place: how the history and atmosphere of a location sometimes can condition behaviour. Psycho-geography is the current term for the connections made when you study a location in depth.



In The Secrets of Pain, the main location is Credenhill, a few miles outside Hereford, where a massive Iron Age hillfort glowers over an area of the Wye Valley where the Romans built a town, long vanished, called Magnis. William Wordsworth, who often stayed here, mentions it in a poem in which ‘the men that have been reappear.’ Wordsworth is remembered at nearby Brinsop Church, where St George is said to have killed the dragon. A mile or so away, two Roman roads enclose the quiet spread of buildings, which is now the headquarters of the Special Air Service, Hereford’s finest.

The SAS, according to Tony Geraghty in his definitive history of The Regiment, Who Dares Wins, ‘is not afraid to declare its own mysticism.’

Hmmm...

This is a crime series. Other elements remain on the periphery. They affect behaviour, they don’t affect the result. Evil is human, no solutions are revealed in dreams. Nevertheless, it’s another dimension to the crime novel, and if it’s going to work it has to take place against an authentic background and contemporary issues - in this case mass-immigration from Eastern Europe and the growth of rural organised crime.

So it’s Easter Week, and savage murder has come to Hereford. A farmer has been hacked to death in his own yard above the Wye Valley and two young women have died in a back street of the city. Merrily Watkins, meanwhile, is concerned about an old colleague, Syd Spicer, who clearly has something on his mind, something he can’t talk about because it concerns his old regiment. She’s not too concerned, obviously, because the SAS can take care of themselves. The SAS know how to deal with fear and pain all its forms.

Well, almost all...

Watch the video of The Secrets of Pain and listen to Phil Rickman talk about the book.

Information:- http://www.philrickman.co.uk

Friday, 9 September 2011

Hardcase Fashionista

It is getting rather exciting for the British Publisher TITAN BOOKS re-launching Charles Ardai’s Hardcase Crime.

Charles was recently featured in an interview at The Rap Sheet with Editor Jeff Pierce -

JKP: We’re used to Hard Case Crime titles coming out in old-fashioned mass-market size. Yet I see that your new paperbacks are all in larger, trade size. What gives?


CA: I always intended to stick with mass-market, but the reality of the publishing business right now is that the mass-market business is imploding--it’s almost impossible not to lose money at it, except maybe if you’re publishing the sort of brand-name million-copy sellers that do good business in supermarkets and at Wal-Mart, which our books just aren’t. John Grisham, Nora Roberts, Dan Brown ... fine. But anything below that level (and we’re several notches below), it just doesn’t work.Meanwhile, trade paperbacks are handsome, give a little more room to showcase our cover art, allow us to make the type size a bit larger (which I know some of our readers will greatly appreciate), and so far it looks like we’ll be able to keep the price point fairly modest--just $9.95, rather than the $12.95 or $14.95 or $17.95 you generally see trade paperbacks going for.So, while the change might have been forced on us by a changing market, it’s actually one I’ve come to feel quite positive about. Feels a little weird, like the first time you switch from glasses to contacts (or vice versa), but the result’s nothing to complain about.

Read More Here

Meanwhile as many consider Hardcase Crime “the best dressed paperbacks on our racks today”, so it came as little surprise that it Hardcase Crime are taking their first steps on the catwalk -

Fashion designer Hally McGehean will be premiering her first wearable art collection during New York Fashion Week in a two-part fashion event in the Meatpacking District and SoHo. Among featured designs of the show, McGehean will debut her Hard Case Crime dress. The Hard Case Crime dress is made out of nearly 1,000 miniature reproductions of covers from the award-winning Hard Case Crime line of retro-styled paperback crime novels. The skirt features every cover ever published in the series, including works by writers like Stephen King and Mickey Spillane, while the daring backless top is composed of interleaved copies of the cover of BABY MOLL by John Farris, whose cover was painted for Hard Case Crime by the legendary illustrator Robert McGinnis (whose other work includes the movie posters for “Breakfast At Tiffany’s” and the original Sean Connery James Bond movies in the 1960s). The outfit’s oversized belt features another McGinnis original, his rare horizontal cover painting for LOSERS LIVE LONGER by Russell Atwood.


Photo Credit Chip Miller


EVENT DETAILS:

Hally McGehean - Pop Up Pop Art Fashion EventMonday, September 12, 2011
Part One: The Highline Runway Walk, Gansevoort Plaza, Gansevoort & Washington Sts., 5pm

Part Two: Boutique Showing of Collection, SoHo Loft Gallery, 180 Lafayette St, 6th Fl 7-9pm

In other news, our line's big relaunch begins in less than two weeks -- GETTING OFF by Lawrence Block and QUARRY'S EX by Max Allan Collins hit stores on September 20, and THE CONSUMMATA by Mickey Spillane and Max Allan Collins and CHOKE HOLD by Christa Faust arrive on October 4.

Read More Here

Thursday, 8 September 2011

Darkly Dreaming Crime-Fiction

Shots eZine are delighted to feature a guest blog by US Law Student Marie Owens discussing the subject of true-crime and the writing process.

Writers are known for their ceaseless imagination. Whether it be a screen-writer or a novelist; authors are constantly required to come up with endless ideas in order to create a prolonged and successful story. Can creativity make an author go a little too far however? People thrive through the art of storytelling, but what can be more intriguing is the background work that authors do in order to make a story well written for its audience.

Criminal stories told through books, television shows, and movies is one of the most popular forms of storytelling and also one of the most important genres in order to maintain fact more than fiction within the work. The book series Dexter by Jeff Lindsay is a great example. “Dexter” is the story about a man, named Dexter, who works as a blood spatter analyst for the Miami Police Department. Dexter is a serial killer who satisfies his uncontrollable impulses to kill by murdering only culprits who have escaped the criminal justice system. Just Dexter's job alone in the show must be difficult to portray accurately by using correct forensic jargon and creating realistic cases for his character to solve. Portraying Dexter's personality must also be changeling. Dexter is a sociopathic serial killer, so it is important to have his character talk and act like one. This isn't common knowledge so how does the reader know whether a criminal writer has a background in criminology such as having a criminal justice degree or has trustworthy expertise in the field?

It's important for a criminal writer to have a knowledgeable background in the stories that they are trying to create because not only does it give their work credibility, but it gives the author the opportunity to teach their audience important and interesting facts regarding the real world of crime.

It is crucial for criminal writers to make sure the facts in their story are as accurate as possible because it will help the story appear more realistic to the audience. How many times have you watched a film or read a book in which an action that the character had done or a scenario created was so completely inaccurate that it made you scoff because you knew it could have been easily portrayed accurately if the author just did a little bit of research? Even the simplest mistakes can lead a fan to stop reading your work all together or not believe you to be a credible author. Creativity is the most important part of storytelling, but it shouldn't drive you to be incorrect. In order to be a credible criminal author one doesn't necessarily have to have a law degree or be the chief of police, but it is important that you take the time to understand the field.

Writing with credibility also gives you a chance to teach your audience interesting facts about dark subjects in crime such as murder. One of the main reasons why people read criminal mystery novels or watch crime shows is because they have a fascination with the subject and want to learn more about it. In fact, New York University Professor Auora Wallace compares criminal television shows to macaroni and cheese “They are enormously comforting. This is the comfort food of television.” This is mainly because people hold a dark fascination for stories outside of their normal lives. Through reading and watching crime television, it’s comforting for people to understand and learn from a dangerous experience that they would never desire in reality. By filling your writing full of accurate situations and characters, people are more likely to appreciate your work and become more intrigued to learn more about the subject you are engulfed in writing about.

All in all, it’s crucial to not depend on just your imagination alone when writing a story. Research and accuracy are just as important. An audience is more loyal when the work is not only credible, but when it also includes accurate facts that they can learn from. Whether you choose to become knowledgeable about law and crime through school, work experience or basic intensive research, its important to know that as a writer you not only need have an extraordinary imagination, but a precise one as well.

Marie Owens is a prospective law student in Washington state with a particular interest in criminal law and gender issues. She writes to promote criminal justice education, and teaches martial arts in her spare time and can be contacted at : marieowens86@gmail.com

Photo of Jeff Lindsay being interviewed by Peter Guttridge © 2008 Ali Karim from Crimefest 2008 Bristol, England

Monday, 5 September 2011

Dunn in Holland

You may have noticed my recent enthusiasm for ex-MI6 field operative’s debut thriller Spartan [aka Spycatcher US title]. Following an interview at The Rap Sheet, speaking to the mysterious Dunn some of you may wish to know what this ex-Intelligence man looks like in the flesh, so I was delighted to see this little clip from Dutch TV where Dunn speaks about the recent Libyan situation, being well versed in geo-politics.



sitestat



If the Video doesn’t load in your browser – click here


Though the program is in Dutch, Dunn’s section is in English with Dutch Subtitles, and a good insight into the man behind the most interesting political thriller I have read this year.

Read More Here

Monday, 29 August 2011

Sam Carver - Blowing up bankers: however did I think of that?


Today’s guest blogger is Tom Cain the pseudonym for an award-winning journalist, with 25 years experience working for Fleet Street newspapers, as well as major magazines in Britain and the US. Carver is the fifth book in the series to feature Samuel Carver as he takes on financial terrorism.


The story that became my latest book Carver began with a simple thought. A modern day Auric Goldfinger, who wanted to become insanely rich and screw the system while he was at it wouldn’t go to all the trouble of nicking the gold from Fort Knox. Why waste time and effort trying to kill the guards, break into the vault, remove and transport all the bullion and then flog it on the black market? These days it’s much easier to steal gigantic amounts of money just sitting at a computer terminal.


I had this thought at a time when the bankers of London and New York were doing precisely that. The Eighties, Nineties and Noughties were decades in which grossly overpaid, shamelessly greedy, utterly unprincipled men in suits carried out a series of gigantic frauds whose sole purpose was to generate false profits from which they could derive undeserved bonuses. The simple truth is that in recent years governments have spent far too much money bailing out banks. And not nearly enough jailing bankers.
Bernie Madoff was the most blatant billion-dollar criminal, if only because his particular fraud was an old-fashioned Ponzi Scheme – using new investors’ money to pay bogus returns on previous investors’ deposits – and he didn’t have the wit to try anything more modern.

Others weren’t so dumb. They created financial derivatives - notably those based on ‘sub-prime’ mortgages taken out by people who couldn’t afford the repayments, buying properties that weren’t worth the sale-price – that were patently unsound, and were recognized as such by the few punters brave enough to bet against them. Then they sold them to idiots (the fact that the fraudsters who created these products and the idiots who bought the belonged to precisely the same banks was crucial: they were all making money at both ends of the deal). Then they treated these sham transactions as if they represented genuine creations of added value, accounted for them as such, and paid themselves gigantic bonuses based on entirely imaginary turnover and profits.


These bonuses represented the only actual cash anywhere in the process … apart, of course, from the huge amounts of money extracted from ordinary taxpayers whose future prosperity was raped to pay the bills run up by these boardroom and trading-desk criminals. There has been a massive transfer of wealth from the poor and middle-class to the very richest members of society, a transfer that has seen a chasm open up between the decreasing living standards of the great majority and the pampered privilege of the tiny, pseudo-meritocracy of bankers, commercial lawyers, senior corporate executives and top-ranking State employees. And you don’t have to be left-wing to feel that this is an outrage. When a multi-billionaire like Warren Buffet says that it’s wrong that he should be the least-taxed employee in his company, then even the doughtiest of capitalists has to admit that something’s going badly wrong.


I saw this coming a fair way off. Unfortunately I wasn’t nearly smart enough to profit from my insight. I didn’t have the first idea about the ways in which I could have placed bets on the inevitable collapse of the whole rotten house of cards. And even if I had known, I wouldn’t have had the guts to put down my stake (assuming I had the spare cash to fund it, which I didn’t, not being a banker). Instead, I did the one thing I know how to do. I wondered how to make a story out of this appalling whole situation.

This was back in late 2006 and early 2007. I was rushing to finish my first Sam Carver book, The Accident Man, and coming to terms with the requirement to come up with a sequel. So as I was finishing one story I was trying to decide what to do for the next one. And because I was obsessed by this gigantic con-trick I could see being played out all around me, I thought that maybe I could place Carver in the middle of it somehow.


But how? Carver is an old-world kind of hero. What he does is physical. He actually kills actual bad guys with actual weapons. He uses fists, guns, wrenches, poisons, and slabs of plastic explosives. He doesn’t just sit at a terminal, clicking the keys. So he’s like a metal-bashing factory worker in a virtual, digital, online world.


Plus, there weren’t too many potential readers who shared my weird obsession. In 2007, there wasn’t a lot of interest in sub-prime mortgages, short-selling or shady financial derivatives. Then 2008 came along, Lehman Brothers collapsed, and the whole global banking system went tits-up and suddenly there was a lot more interest.

But I still didn’t have a story. And to be honest, I’m not quite sure precisely how I found one. Normally I can point to ‘Eureka!’ moments when I see a picture in my head and know I’ve got the key moment in a book; or when I encounter the person who inspires a crucial character. But in the case of Carver, it was much more amorphous. There was a story in Vanity Fair about the way in which Lehman Brothers demanded total devotion not just from their executives, but also the executives’ families. There were conversations with friends who knew about how the City really worked. Having had a grossly misshapen, malevolent villain in my previous book, Dictator, there was a sense that I wanted one this time who was actually likeable, a an who might seduce readers into seeing things from his point-of-view, just as he seduces the fictional characters around him.


From this came the character of Malachi Zorn, a financial genius who hates the system that has made him rich, because (for reasons revealed in the book) it also made him an orphan. He wants revenge on the institutions that destroyed his family and he really doesn’t care who else has to suffer n order to help him get it. Naturally, the specific form of revenge he seeks is financial: he knows that there is no blow as painful to a rich man as one that hits him in the wallet. So far, so good … even I found myself rooting for Zorn at this point. But then he started behaving very badly. People started dying in large numbers and it was time for Sam Carver to sort him out. But do the financiers who populate Carver get away entirely unscathed? Ah, well, you’ll have to read it to find that out …

Monday, 22 August 2011

St Hilda's Crime & Mystery Weekend - Anatomy of Justice


(Val McDermid & Ayo Onatade - Picture © Marcia Talley)

I thought that I was going to have the opportunity to blog about the conference over this weekend but alas not. It is a testament to how much fun I was having over the weekend that I did not manage to do any blogging.

If you have never managed to attend St Hilda’s Crime and Mystery Conference then you have missed a treat. Unlike Crimefest or Harrogate St Hilda’s is a lot more academic. The weekend is always based around a theme that is chosen and agreed by the organisers at the end of each previous conference. This year the theme of the conference was Anatomy of Justice and the papers that were presented all used this as the main background to their talk.

As an attendee you know that St Hilda’s has started when everyone gathers on the lawn overlooking the River Cherwell for a champagne reception early on Friday evening. It is not only a chance for everyone to meet up before the conference starts in earnest on the Saturday morning but it is also a chance to renew friendships, see which of the stalwarts are back again and generally catch up amongst the spires of Merton and Magdalen College. The drinks reception is always followed by the first of the two conference dinners and by tradition those that are giving a paper on the Saturday get to sit at the top table. Thus I found myself on the top table alongside Kate Charles, Val McDermid, Cath Staincliffe, Triona Adams, Natasha (NJ) Cooper who was Chair of the conference this year, Frances Fyfield and Ann Granger. Both Val McDermid and Triona Adams are former students of St Hilda’s. In fact Val is now a Fellow of the college as well. After the dinner there is always a conference dinner speaker. This year it was Triona Adams who spoke about remembering the late Sarah Caudwell with whom she was a great friend. Sarah Caudwell had in fact been a speaker at the very first conference back in 1994. After dinner everybody wandered down to the Senior Common Room (SCR) and spent the rest of the evening just talking and catching up with one another. This was enlivened by the added fact that Eileen Roberts the co-organiser kindly added to the jollity of the occasion by supplying wine.

The conference well and truly started on Saturday morning after breakfast. One of the things that I like about St Hilda’s is the fact that you all stay together on the College grounds. It is very reminiscent of being back in boarding school but it is such good fun that one does not worry too much at the basic facilities. Some people may but I certainly do not. It always adds to the fun. The first papers that were given were by Val McDermid and myself. My paper was entitled Life along the Judicial Corridor whilst Val’s paper was entitled Making the Law work for you: an author’s guide. I don’t normally talk about my day job and this was one of the few times that I spoke about working with senior members of the judiciary for the last 12 years. Val spoke eloquently about how making the law work for authors. What generally tends to happen is that after two papers are given then the speakers answer questions from the audience.

After a brief break for tea and coffee the second round of papers were given. This time Frances Fyfield spoke about Peculiar Trials and after listening to a radio programme that she had done on BBC World Service about animals going on trial for offences that they had committed she also spoke about why this happened. Cath Staincliffe who gave a heartfelt, thought provoking and moving paper about assisted dying and the way in which it is dealt with by the law, followed Frances Fyfield. A lively discussion took place afterwards and this included P D James who was attending the conference for part of the day who commented on the difficulties surrounding assisted dying.

After lunch the first two papers that were given were by Jane Finnis who spoke about Laws and Sausages: Justice in the Roman Empire and Ann Granger who spoke about Newgate Prison and whether or not it was a symbol of its times? Following a brief break again for tea Andrew Taylor and Martin Edwards were the next two to give the final papers of the day. Andrew spoke about Willkie Collins and the women in his life. Andrew Taylor’s talk was most interesting as he highlighted the rather strange relationship that Willkie Collins with the two main women in his life and the way in which he managed to balance the two together. When he died he even split his possessions equally between the two families. Martin’s talk was about British lawyers who are also authors. Martin himself falls into this group along with Rankin Davies, Dexter Dias and the late Cyril Hare. He also discussed Tragedy at Law, which is the book that Cyril Hare is best known for. It was interesting listening to both Andrew Taylor and Martin Edwards as they answered questions afterwards. They make a very good double team.

(Martin Edwards & Andrew Taylor - Picture © Ayo Onatade)

You always pick up snippets of interesting information whilst you are at St Hilda’s and this year was no exception. Did you know that the late Michael Gilbert was once Raymond Chandler’s legal advisor? I didn’t!

After the final papers on Saturday there is always a signing session for all the authors that are present. This takes place in the SCR and it is always and opportunity for attendees to get their books signed by authors that are present whether or not that author is actually giving a paper. It is also an opportunity for photographs to be taken and conversations to take place between attendees and the authors in a much more relaxed atmosphere.

The after dinner speech on the Saturday evening is always given by the conference Chair and this year NJ Cooper gave a speech on recalling Trish Maguire. What has now become a tradition; Mystery Women hosted a drinks reception in the SCR. Those of you that know me are aware of the fact that I have no qualms in staying up late at these things. However, I was remarkably restrained and found myself back in my room just after 12:00am on Friday and Saturday.

Sunday is always slightly different and after breakfast there is the opportunity to do whatever you like. Whether it be go to Church, punt or just relax. This year I made the most of the opportunity and wandered up the Cowley Road with my friend and fantasy author Juliet McKenna to have a relaxing morning catching up with her and would you believe to do so work as well!




(Bernard Knight - Picture © Ayo Onatade)

The talks began mid-morning with a fascinating Conference Lecture by the Conference Guest of Honour Professor Bernard Knight CBE. His lecture was on The Coroner: Medieval Relic or useful institution? In essence it was a history of the work of the Coroner. He explained that Coroners only came into being around 1194 partly due to Richard the Lionheart. Their job was varied and multifaceted but always had a financial backdrop. It was not until 1282 that Coroners were established in Wales. Bernard Knight’s talk covered a wide broad spectrum of the work of the Coroner from its original beginnings to the present day. He touched on some of the more unusual aspects of the early work of a Coroner, which included the fact that they used to have to attend all hangings. Only a Coroner could declare someone an outlaw if they did not turn up to court after three chances. They were appointed by the King to do anything. He also pointed out that police programmes often got the role of the Coroner wrong. As he explained, they could call for a Doctor but a post-mortem could not be done without the permission of a Coroner. Rather sadly this is not the impression that is given on police programmes.

Professor Knight is a former Home Office Pathologist who has dealt with some rather high-profile cases. He is also the author of the Crowner John Mysteries a series of 12th Century historical mysteries featuring Sir John de Wolfe Coroner of the Verge. So far there are 14 books in the series. He is also the author of the Dr Richard Pryor series, which is set in 1955 Wales.

(Penny Evans - Picture © Ayo Onatade)

After lunch the final session of the day started. Penny Evans spoke on the topic of provocation and how it is dealt with by the law under the title Wicked Mr Boyce and the slow burn: A talk about why it is better to kill your husband when he’s awake… As she pointed out, women are most certainly given a rough deal when provocation is raised as a defence in court compared to men. The final paper of the day was given by Keith Miles (aka Edward Marston) who spoke wittily and extremely funnily about the character Rumpole of the Bailey. It was a fitting end to the conference.

One cannot thank Eileen Roberts and Kate Charles enough for organising such a wonderful conference. Furthermore having a wonderful Chair adds to the lustre and NJ Cooper was absolutely wonderful. She is so good at putting people at ease and she does it with such charm and style.

So what about next year?

The dates have already been agreed and the theme chosen. Next year St Hilda’s Crime and Mystery Conference will take place between 17th and 19th August 2012 and the theme is Stop You’re Killing Me: Humour in Crime Fiction. So note the date and I look forward to seeing many of you there!

Friday, 19 August 2011

Shortlists Announced For The Specsavers Crime Thriller Awards 2011

Brutal, bloodied and with a forensic approach to detail, the CWA Daggers shortlist contains a powerhouse of literary talent. For all their detective ability and searing insights, even the authors themselves cannot be expected to work out how these plots will end. The winners for eleven awards will be announced at The Specsavers Crime Thriller Awards on Friday 7 October at the Grosvenor House.


The awards include the CWA Gold Dagger for the Best Crime Novel of the Year, the CWA Ian Fleming Steel Dagger for the Best Thriller of the Year, and the CWA John Creasey (New Blood) Dagger for the Best New Crime Writer of the Year, along with the Film and TV Daggers.

Can Man Booker nominee A.D. Miller beat off the competition to take home one the most illustrious prizes in the crime writing world – the CWA Gold Dagger for the Best Crime Novel of the Year? He faces a struggle of Cold-War proportions as Snowdrops, his grim tale of life in Putin's Russia, sizes up to Tom Franklin's Crooked Letter, Crooked Letter, set in the Deep South.

It is by no means a two horse race, with The End of the Wasp Season by Denise Mina bringing a strong female protagonist into the mix. A complex look at the dehumanisation of victims in an increasingly divided society, The End of The Wasp Season suggests that as a society we use 'evil' as a means to disengage from our problems. But could she perhaps lose out to one of the most disengaged characters seen in fiction in recent years – Mike, in Steve Hamilton's The Lock Artist is an elective mute who can pick locks and break safes. The question remains, however, whether Hamilton himself has cracked the code in writing prize winning crime fiction.

The shortlists are as follows:

CWA GOLD DAGGER 2011

Crooked Letter, Crooked Letter by Tom Franklin (Pan)

Snowdrops by A.D. Miller (Atlantic Books)

The End of the Wasp Season by Denise Mina (Orion)

The Lock Artist by Steve Hamilton (Orion)

CWA IAN FLEMING STEEL DAGGER 2011, SPONSORED BY IAN FLEMING PUBLICATIONS LTD

Before I Go To Sleep by S.J. Watson (Doubleday)

Cold Rain by Craig Smith (Myrmidon)

The Good Son by Michael Gruber (Corvus)

The Lock Artist by Steve Hamilton (Orion)

CWA JOHN CREASEY (NEW BLOOD) DAGGER 2011

Before I Go To Sleep by S. J. Watson (Doubleday)

Kiss Me Quick by Danny Miller (Robinson)

The Dead Woman of Juárez by Sam Hawken (Serpent's Tail)

The Dogs of Rome by Conor Fitzgerald (Bloomsbury)

ITV3 PEOPLE'S BESTSELLER DAGGER 2011

David Baldacci - The Sixth Man (Macmillan)

Lee Child - Worth Dying For (Bantam)

Mark Billingham - Good As Dead (Little, Brown)

Peter James - Dead Man's Grip (Macmillan)

Peter Robinson - Before the Poison (Hodder)

These five authors are also the subject of the 2011 season documentary series The A-Z of Crime, which will be shown at 9pm on ITV3 from 1st September.

In the weeks running up to The Crime Thriller Awards 2011, viewers will be encouraged to vote for their favourite by following this link: www.itv.com/crimethrillerawards. The winner will be presented with the ITV3 People's Bestseller Dagger at the awards ceremony on 7th October.

TV and film are the perfect media for crime fiction, and some of the genre's best-loved detectives – from Marple to Morse – have been immortalised in this way. This year's Specsavers Crime Thriller Awards will honour the stars of the small and silver screens, as well as the films and series they feature in. The nominees include actors Idris Elba, last year's Best Actress Dagger winner Maxine Peake, Brenda Blethyn, Rufus Sewell and Rafe Spall, and the shortlists are as follows:

THE FILM DAGGER

True Grit (Paramount Pictures)

The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest (Momentum Pictures)

Brighton Rock (Optimum Releasing)

Source Code (Optimum Releasing)

THE TV DAGGER

Case Histories (Ruby Films, BBC One)

Luther (BBC One)

The Shadow Line (Company Pictures, BBC Two)

Zen (Left Bank Pictures, BBC One)

Vera (ITV Studios, ITV1)

THE INTERNATIONAL TV DAGGER

The Killing, (Arrow Films, BBC4)

Boardwalk Empire (HBO, Sky Atlantic)

Castle (ABC Studios, Alibi)

Dexter (Showtime Networks, FX Channel)

Spiral (Son Et Lumiere, BBC 4)

BEST ACTRESS DAGGER

Sofie Gråbøl for The Killing (Arrow Films, BBC4)

Brenda Blethyn for Vera (ITV Studios, ITV1)

Maxine Peake for Silk (BBC One)

Olivia Williams for Case Sensitive (Hat Trick Productions, ITV1)

Sue Johnston for Waking the Dead (BBC One)

Kelly Reilly for Above Suspicion (La Plante Productions, ITV1)

BEST ACTOR DAGGER

Idris Elba for Luther (BBC One)

Lars Mikkelsen for The Killing (Arrow Films, BBC4)

Steve Buscemi for Boardwalk Empire (HBO, Sky Atlantic)

Jason Isaacs for Case Histories (Ruby Films, BBC One)

Rufus Sewell for Zen (Left Bank Pictures, BBC One)

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR DAGGER

Rafe Spall for The Shadow Line (Company Pictures, BBC Two)

Bjarne Henriksen for The Killing (Arrow Films, BBC 4)

Søren Malling for The Killing (Arrow Films, BBC 4)

John Lithgow for Dexter (Showtime Networks, FX Channel)

Aidan Gillen for Thorne (Stagereel / Cité Amérique, Sky One)

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS DAGGER

Ann Eleonora Jørgensen for The Killing (Arrow Films, BBC 4)

Kelly Macdonald for Boardwalk Empire (HBO, Sky Atlantic)

Ruth Wilson for Luther (BBC One)

Amanda Abbington for Case Histories (Ruby Films, BBC One)

Tara Fitzgerald for Waking The Dead (BBC One)

The Executive Producer for the Awards and the Crime Season, Cactus TV's Amanda Ross said: "We are absolutely delighted with the success of The Specsavers Crime Thriller Awards last year. With Marcus Brigstocke returning as our presenter and the high quality of this year's Book, Film and TV shortlists I am confident this year's awards will be even better."

Peter James, Chair of the Crime Writers' Association, commented: "To arrive at the shortlist for any award is inevitably a hard and very subjective task. But this year's Daggers shortlists really do represent a very broad cross-section of the highest talents in our beloved genre, and I'm personally feeling very thrilled - and deeply privileged - to have been selected amongst them."

Richard Holmes, Specsavers marketing director, said: "Last year's Crime Thriller Awards were another great success and we're very proud to be involved in this annual showcase of world class writing. It must have been extremely difficult to create this shortlist from the wealth of crime fiction talent out there and I'm really looking forward to hearing the results of the awards. As ever, I can't wait to find out how it all ends."

It would be interesting to hear from you who you think should win in the many categories. I have my favourites for sure.




Anatomy of Justice at St Hilda's Crime & Mystery Weekend

The 18th Annual Mystery and Crime Weekend is due to start this evening from 6:45pm at St Hilda’s College, Oxford. St Hilda’s is not like Crimefest or Harrogate. It is a lot more academic. Each year it has a theme and those giving a talk must use the theme as the background for their paper.

Those giving a talk this year on Saturday are-

Francis Fyfield who will be talking about Peculiar Trials and Cath Staincliffe whose talk is entitled When mercy is murder: a look at the law and assisted dying. Jane Finnis and Ann Granger will be talking about Justice in the Roman Empire and Newgate Prison: A symbol of its times? Respectively.

Andrew Taylor will be talking about Wilkie Collins and Little Women. Whilst Martin Edwards talk is entitled The British Lawyer-Author.

I shall be sharing the very first talk on Saturday morning alongside the ever-delightful Val McDermid. Val will be giving a talk on Making the Law work for you: an author’s guide whilst my paper is called Life along the Judicial Corridor.

On Sunday talks will be given by Penny Evans who will be talking about Why it’s better to kill your husband when he’s awake and Keith Miles on Rumpole of the Bailey.

There will also be two conference dinner speeches. The first will be given by Triona Adams who will be remembering Sarah Caudwell and the second will be given by Natasha Cooper (who is also chairing the conference) who will be recalling Trish Maguire.

The Conference Guest of Honour this year is Professor Bernard Knight who will be giving the conference lecture on The Coroner: Medieval Relic or Useful Institution?

St Hilda’s is a really unique conference. It has been going on for 18 years now and there are a lot of die hard fans that regularly attend. Everybody stays on the college grounds. I shall be hopefully blogging about the weekend whilst I am there.

Thursday, 18 August 2011

According to Sophie Hannah No One Would Ever Do That!


Today’s guest blogger is award winning author and poet Sophie Hannah. Her novel The Other Half Lives was shortlisted for the 2010 Independent Booksellers’ Book of the Year Award and is currently shortlisted, under its US title The Dead Lie Down, for a Barry Award. Her first novel was adapted for television under the title Case Sensitive in May 2011. A second series has been commissioned. She is currently working on her seventh novel featuring Simon Waterhouse and Charlie Zailer entitled Kind of Cruel and it is due out in February 2012. Sophie is fascinated by properties and spends a lot of time looking at property sites.


Here’s what I find implausible: that time and time again, intelligent people will read a crime novel with an unusual plot, or watch a thriller at the cinema with an outlandish storyline, and say, ‘But no one would ever do that’, or, ‘But that would never happen’. That’s right – I can't believe that anyone can't believe that bizarrely improbable things happen in real life. Take my sister, an otherwise rational person. For years, she and I have disagreed about the Hitchcock film Vertigo. We both love it, but whereas I love it unconditionally, my sister thinks it’s flawed. ‘There’s no way Jimmy Stewart wouldn’t recognise Kim Novak when he bumps into her on the street and she’s got dark hair and a different name,’ she says. ‘He wouldn’t be entranced by her resemblance to his dead beloved; he would know, straight away, that she was the same person.’ For years, my counter-argument went something like this: ‘Oh, well, maybe you have to suspend your disbelief a bit, but so what?’ Then something happened that changed my mind. I was in Crete, in a tiny place called Loutro, and I went swimming in the sea. Treading water beside me was a man who looked very much like a good friend of mine, someone I’d known for fifteen years and saw regularly. Instead of thinking, ‘Oh, look, there’s Giles’, what I thought was, ‘How odd that a stranger in Loutro looks so much like Giles’. I was convinced that he couldn’t be Giles; there was no connection in my mind between Giles and Loutro, and it would have been too huge a coincidence for both me and Giles to be swimming in Loutro at the same time. I said nothing to this man and carried on swimming. Next time I swam past him, I heard him cough. In a distinctive way. I thought, ‘That’s Giles’ cough – an exact copy of it.’ Tentatively, I swam up to him and said, ‘Excuse me, you aren’t by any chance...?’ Even then, I wasn’t convinced enough to say, ‘Hey, Giles! What a coincidence!’ Even then, if he’d said, in Giles’ voice, ‘I’m terribly sorry, my name’s Duncan and I’ve never seen you before in my life’, I’d have believed him and apologised for bothering him. ‘Sophie!’ he said. ‘I wondered if it was you, but I didn’t think it could be.’ Each of us trusted our own incorrect assumption that the other one couldn't possibly be in Loutro more than we trusted the evidence of our own eyes. I remember thinking it odd that he started to look so much more like Giles as soon as I knew he was Giles – before that point, the resemblance wasn’t quite so overwhelming, because I was viewing him through the lens of what I thought I knew.

All of which convinces me that a) my sister is wrong about Vertigo and b) people talk about suspension of disbelief when they shouldn’t; there should be no disbelief to suspend. If I asked a hundred people, ‘Has anything implausible ever happened to you?’, most of them would say yes. If I’m right, and if we allow ourselves to extrapolate from the past to predict the future, that surely means there’s a strong likelihood of coincidental, unlikely things happening all the time. People say ‘That would never happen’, when what they mean is, ‘I’ve never heard of that happening, and therefore I am choosing to believe that it couldn’t happen, because I’m an unimaginative person.’ Take the true story of the man who has come to be known as Canoe Man. He and his wife pretended he was dead, even to their two sons. Especially to their two sons, you might say. Meanwhile, he’d cut a hole in a bedroom wall and put a cupboard in front of it, and when anyone turned up at the house, he would climb into the wardrobe, through the hole, and into the house next door which (and if it were fiction people would say, ‘Oh, how implausible’) was a) owned by him and b) conveniently empty. Later, after getting away with it, he and his wife allowed their photograph to be taken for a website (‘Oh, come on! If you’d faked your own death, would you really let someone photograph you for a website?’) and the whole story came out: a fascinating, unique story, just as Vertigo is a brilliant, gripping story, and one that could happen. Can anyone prove, categorically, that it couldn’t? Can anyone say for certain that no one man would ever meet a former lover he believed to be dead and take her to be a different person? For something to be plausible, it only needs to be possible for it to happen once, in a particular and often unique combination of circumstances. This is the yardstick that I believe all writers of crime fiction - or indeed any fiction - should use.


The onus should be on the disbelievers, whenever they say, ‘No one would ever do that’, to prove they’re right. In the absence of concrete proof, we have to choose: do we dismiss possibilities or embrace them? Do we only want to write and read about people behaving in commonplace, likely ways? Well, probably only if the protagonists’ reactions to those ordinary events are in some way unlikely or unusual. A novel about a man who left his wallet at home and then went back to pick it up later would be boring; a novel about a man who forgot his wallet and, as a direct result, decided to give away his vast fortune to the poor, or suffered a complete breakdown and came to believe that he was a gerbil – that might be more interesting. And the disbelievers would carp that it was implausible.


Let’s assume the carpers are right: no one would ever do those extraordinary, seemingly impossible things they refuse to believe in; the only stories that are possible are the ones that strike us as probable. In that scenario, wouldn’t it be the duty of writers to invent things that ‘would never happen’, as the only way of extending our imaginations and experience? If it’s really impossible for something staggeringly unusual to happen, thank God people make up implausible stories that show us what we might do, even if we haven’t done it yet and might never do it. It is the events in which we become embroiled and entangled that define us as people. Or, to put it another way, without plot there is no character. Devising unusual, even far-fetched plots is the proper way for a writer to explore the extreme possibilities of character. Contrary to what many creative writing manuals tell us, characterisation is not about your protagonist's favourite breakfast cereal or make of car. It's about how your fictional heroine will react when she finds herself in a predicament that she didn't foresee, because it was so unlikely to happen.


Information: - http://www.sophiehannah.com/

Wednesday, 17 August 2011

Bite Sized Daniel Polansky

Daniel Polansky was our guest blogger yesterday but we managed to get our hands on this exclusive quick bite sized Q&A. There will be a fuller interview over in the main website in the next few days.
What is the difference between Low Town and Baltimore?
Fewer swords.

Pixie’s Breath, Choke or Wyrm: which would you recommend?
Depends on what you're holding.

Why winter? Is it a mood thing ...?
It's meant to evoke a certain atmosphere, sure.

How do you view the marriage of classic crime and high fantasy - and was it easy to pull off?
I felt like a lot of what is great about well done in crime novels, in terms of a fast pacing and realistic motivations, could be effectively introduced into a high fantasy mold. As far as the degree to which I did it successfully, I'll leave that to the reader to decide.

You have traveled a lot - do any of the strange places you have visited find their place in SRC?
In a sort of oblique way, I suppose. I've spent a lot of time in different cities, from Washington D.C. to Belgrade to Delhi, so that gets you thinking about the way these places are set up, and how an imaginary metropolis might behave. And sometimes you meet somebody or see some particular sight that you can wholesale thieve from reality and write up in your book. That's a lot of fun.

Do the names of places and things in the book come to you as you write about them, or do they come in the middle of the night, or whenever it is that you dream?
Getting a decent naming convention down is one of the more difficult parts of writing speculative fiction, and one I've struggled with. Sometimes things just come naturally, but usually it requires research and contemplation.

Your literary heroes, please, authors and characters
Heroes is kind of a loaded word. Obviously the archetypal noir hero as exemplified by Dashiel Hammet's continental op and Raymond Chandler's Phillip Marlowe were a big influence on the Warden. In terms of authors that I've strongly connected with, really the list could run on -- everyone from Rudyard Kipling to Hannah Arendt to John Keegan to V.S. Naipaul.

Should the book be made into a film - who would you have direct it?
What is John Ford doing these days?

What would be on the accompanying soundtrack to Straight Razor Cure?
Ghostface Killah, Johnny Cash, and of course, J Dilla.

Who are your sci/fi and fantasy influences?
I'm sort of bearish about a lot of high fantasy. Like the rest of the planet, I love George R.R. Martin. I think Gene Wolfe has written some real classics. Jorge Louis Borges is a true genius, and someone I've probably cribbed from in a lot of ways.

Can you tell us anything about what’s coming next for The Warden?
Without going into to much detail about a sequel still in development, I would say very bad things are coming for the Warden. We'll see if he survives them.







Tuesday, 16 August 2011

Slums of the Shire with Daniel Polansky


Our guest blogger today is Daniel Polansky whose debut novel Low Town is published in the US today (16 August 2011) and in the UK under the title The Straight Razor Cure on 18 August 2011. He talks about being a history buff, not understanding fantasy and hopefully using his novel to answer some quesions.


Occasionally you'll be with a group of people and they'll get to talking about their favorite historical epochs, nostalgic for lives they never led. One person will talk up their childhood love of the Wild West, another reveal a penchant for Victorian England. This last one just has a thing for corsets, but it's better not to call them on it.


When my turn rolls round I take a sip of whatever we're drinking and look at my shoes. “The mid 90's were pretty good,” I say lamely. “Slower internet and everything, but at least we had penicillin.”


Perhaps it's my being a history buff, but the past sucked. For about a millennium and a half after the fall of the Roman Empire, Europe just seems like a real shit place to reside. Lots of rooting in filth until you die at thirty a half mile from where you born. Nominally the nobles had it better, but still, your fever would have been treated with the application of leaches and your pretty young bride had like a one in two chance of surviving child birth.


This probably is why I don't understand fantasy—that is to say that collection of high medieval tropes collected by Tolkien and gleefully reproduced by two generations of descendants.


Take elves for instance—though perfectly capable of imagining a world where higher intelligence evolved in a species separate from humanity, my powers of make believe fail when positing that the relation between said species would be anything beyond unceasing warfare. Even a cursory glance at human history reveals our collective willingness to commit genocide on fellow homo sapiens—how much quicker would we have been to eradicate a separate species competing for identical resources? If elves existed, our ancestors would have hunted them down to extinction and erected a monument to the accomplishment.



But I digress.


Even when nestled comfortably in a quest to kill a dragon or overthrow a dark lord or what have you, strange thoughts plague me. What does the shady side of Gondor look like? How many platinum coins would a dime bag set me back? What is the point of hobbits? They're just short, fat people. People are plenty fat as it is.


Low Town is sort of my attempt to answer some of those questions (not the last one). It's the story of the Warden, a former intelligence agent and current drug dealer, whose gradual slide into self-destruction is briefly checked by the discovery of a dead body in the neighborhood he runs. An ill-timed bout of conscience rattles the easy cage of venality he's built for himself, and leads him on a collision course with the life he'd left behind. The Warden is a guy trying to survive the next few days, and not particularly squeamish as to what that requires—the sort of person more likely to populate a classic crime novel than to be found stocking the fantasy section of your local Borders (RIP).

More broadly, Low Town is an attempt to meld the best aspects of noir with a low fantasy setting—a meeting of tastes which I think complement each other nicely. The spare language and fast pace of good noir offers a pleasant counterpoint to the sprawling—one might even say bloated—length of much modern fantasy. On a somewhat broader level, the tendency of fantasy to focus on world shaking events often renders it irrelevant to the average reader, whose life relatively rarely devolves into single combat against vaguely satanic analogs. By contrast, noir is concerned with the individual, with greed and lust, sins all of us can comprehend to some degree. Low Town centers on the conceit that a world with magic wouldn't be altogether different from a world without it. People are still (on the whole) selfish, stupid creatures, focused almost exclusively on the immediate satisfaction of their basic desires, only now some of them can shoot fire out of their hands.


That's the idea at least. It comes out today (August 16th) in the US and Canada, and on Thursday (August 18th) in the UK and Commonwealth. I hope you check it out and see if I've succeeded, or if I'm just a pretentious clown. Or both.


Information:- http://www.Danielpolansky.com