A fundamental part of a mystery story is
discovering what is fact and what is fiction, who is telling the truth and who
is not. Is a witness’s memory reliable and has that witness correctly
interpreted what he or she has seen? If this investigative process goes awry,
the wrong man or woman may be convicted.
Edgar Allan Poe and the
London Monster takes a
true crime story and twists it into a fictional tale by re-imagining
‘who-dunit’, then revisiting the recorded facts of the crimes from the
point-of-view of these imagined perpetrators. The historical facts are these:
from 1788 - 1790 a person or persons attacked over fifty women, slashing their
skirts and derrières. In that era, intentionally defacing another person’s
clothing in public was a felony that could be punished by transportation or
hanging. Descriptions of the male perpetrator varied considerably, which did
not help with his apprehension. Hysteria mounted as attacks escalated in 1790
and vigilantes were formed; women wore copper pots to shield their posteriors;
and a £100 reward was offered for the villain's capture and conviction. Soon
after the reward was posted, a victim claimed to spot her assailant who was
duly arrested and, after two trials, imprisoned for six years.
But was the right person convicted? Certainly the
accused had not been proven guilty with hard evidence. The Old Bailey
transcripts of the trials reveal them to be high farce. If the accused were
truly innocent and two actors with a facility for disguise were the real
culprits (as some newspapers of the day suggested) then what was the story of
the actual perpetrators who got away with it? That was the alternative history
I wanted to write, and I played profiler to develop the tale.
First of all, I had to pin down motive. I am most
interested in crimes with a personal motive, so I settled on revenge. I decided
that the perpetrators would be a husband and wife team, ‘theatre-folk’ but with
different family backgrounds, which was a source of conflict. I then went
through each London Monster attack and invented a context for it, deciding who
did the slashing and why, presenting details of the crimes in letters the couple
exchanged.
This collection of letters, apparently written by
his grandparents, is delivered to Edgar Allan Poe in 1840, an inheritance that
makes him travel to London to prove that the missives are forgeries; his
grandparents are innocent; and the London Monster is merely a fabrication
rather than fact. And so begins the mystery that he and his friend the great
ratiocinator C. Auguste Dupin must unravel while someone, motivated by revenge,
watches their every move and reveals, bit by bit, further events from the past
that come back to haunt Poe.
Karen Lee Street is the author of Edgar Allan Poe and the London Monster (Point
Blank Books, 7 April 2016, hardback £14.99), the first of a trilogy.
Summer, 1840. Edgar Allan Poe sails from
Philadelphia to London to meet his friend C. Auguste Dupin, in hope that the
great detective will help him solve a family mystery. For Poe inherited a
mahogany box containing a collection of letters allegedly written by his
grandparents, Elizabeth and Henry Arnold. The Arnolds were actors who struggled
to make a living on the London stage, but the mysterious letters suggest that
the couple played a more clandestine role - stalking well-to-do young women at
night, to slice their clothing and derrieres. Poe hopes to prove the missives
forgeries; Dupin wonders if they are real, but their content is fantasy. Soon
Poe is being stalked by someone who knows far more about his grandparents and
their crimes than he does. And then he remembers disturbing attacks made upon
him as a child in London ...Could the perpetrators be connected?
Her
publications include Tattoos and
Motorcycles, a collection of short stories linked by a crime, and Writing and Selling Crime Film Screenplays.
This is her first novel.
You can follow her on Twitter @karenleestreet
1 comment:
this sounds to be a very good read! on my wish list!
Post a Comment